BIA is pleased to welcome Steve Bass as a guest author. Steve is an advisor, musician, former President and CEO of Oregon Public Broadcasting, and he is now an Executive Advisor for BIA Advisory Services. We invite you to enjoy his insights on public media, including the challenges they face during this time of budget cuts and the opportunities ahead. If you’d like to discuss any related topics, please let me know. Rick Ducey, Managing Director, BIA Advisory Services
Public media has existed in two distinct eras, and we’re entering the third. The first was before the creation of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) in 1967, when public media was a scrappy ecosystem of non-commercial radio and television stations without much of an audience or national profile. The second era was marked by the nationalization of the service after the passage of the Public Broadcasting Act and the founding of PBS and NPR. Public media existed before federal funding, and it will continue to exist in this third, evolving era. But it will be different. Losing federal funding is a huge immediate challenge, but it may not be the biggest one.
Adapting to a rapid shift in audience behavior is the existential challenge. Audiences are shifting from traditional linear broadcast consumption to on demand and mobile. Broadcasting no longer conveys a geographic monopoly on the distribution of content. It’s becoming clear that a business model based largely on the broadcast distribution of national programming leased from PBS and NPR is declining.
There still is life left in public media’s legacy distribution business, but it will not last forever. A pivot to unique local services is the opportunity. I shared some thoughts on this in a September 2024 piece I authored for the public media publication, Current. Here are some more thoughts on the way forward for public media at this critical time.
Redefining universal service/access. The Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 created the concept of (and funding for) universal service. Public broadcasting is nearly ubiquitous in terms of broadcast coverage, reaching about 99% of the US population. Maintaining that kind of broadcast coverage will be difficult without government subsidies. And it may not be necessary for much longer as the dominance of broadcasting continues to erode.
Broadcast distribution ensured that public media content was freely available. That commitment should endure as a general principle as it is an important differentiator of our service. Public media content should continue to be generally free even as the cost of distribution (e.g., mobile and broadband) gets shifted to consumers which seems inevitable.
Rethinking the real and imagined constraints of government funding. For decades, CPB funding was the most stable and predictable source of support for many local public media organizations. Protecting it was the lens through which many strategic decisions were made. That strategic lens is shattered.
Without dismissing the significance of the loss of federal funding (it’s big), there is now a necessity to change the mindset. Indecision and timidity need to give way to bolder and quicker actions. Public media leaders will need to be more open to ideas that might have been discarded in the past due to fears about the impact on government funding.
Broadening the boundaries of the public media ecosystem. The Public Broadcasting Act defined public media solely as FCC-licensed non-commercial radio and television stations. Funding flowed only to this exclusive club through separate radio and television grant programs. That made sense for decades while broadcasting reigned supreme. Today, there is an array of public interest media organizations pursuing similar aims but without legacy broadcasting licenses. Broadening the definition of the ecosystem to include them could unlock opportunities for expanded public service at the local level. There are already models for this, with the numerous public media organizations having absorbed other news organizations.
More public service, fewer managements. The historic drive toward universal broadcast reach for public media created redundancies and inefficiencies. For more than a decade, CPB provided funding for local public media organizations to better collaborate and even merge. But relatively few have moved in that direction. The cost of operating hundreds of autonomous public television and radio organizations is high and likely not sustainable.
There are instances where stand-alone governance and management are necessary, such as for Tribal and minority service stations. But in most cases, greater community presence (such as reporters on the ground) and fewer management needs to be the new norm.
There is a need for new ways to address common challenges going forward. CPB played a unique role in the public media ecosystem beyond community service grants. It initiated and funded critical needs of the ecosystem like interconnection, music rights negotiations, and common tech applications (such as the Grove content management system).
These common needs will remain, and new ones will emerge after CPB closes its doors. NPR and PBS will try to fill the vacuum created, but this may not best serve the needs and interests of the ecosystem. The driving force of both organizations is national content, so serving other needs of the ecosystem has always been secondary. Each has strategies to directly serve audiences, solicit donations and elevate their own brands which makes it difficult (if not impossible) to center the needs of local public media organizations.
I believe the best approach is to create a new organization with the sole function of serving the shared needs of the public media ecosystem. This could include designing and operating interconnection systems (and making them more cost-efficient), negotiating music rights, and licensing/creating tech for public media. This organization should be chartered and governed in a way that holds it accountable to members of the ecosystem, putting their needs first. This would better serve the ecosystem while freeing up PBS and NPR to focus on what they do best.
Navigating the amount of change right now is a huge challenge. Each individual organization must evolve and so must the long list of organizations that support and serve the ecosystem (NPR, PBS, APTS, SRG, PTVMMG, NETA, Greater Public, APM, PRX, etc.).
It’s a time to courageously question long-held assumptions and create new ways to achieve public media’s public service mission. Millions are counting on us to figure this out.
